Convience Part III

The closer the proximity, the more details are revealed, along with the clarity of what was out of focus. My furthest admiration’s are obtained effortlessly by reaching to the nearest reflection of it. Modernity emphasizes grand gestures that are difficult to execute as a form of flattery, directly contradicting obtaining something with little trouble. It’s attractive to seemingly believe one can go beyond reason without hesitation or difficulty.

Strife and courage can be attributed to feeling pursued, along with the general psychological principle of wanting what others can’t have as a from of valued necessity. What’s implied is the relationship to possession, what does it mean to me? How much do I want something slippery without getting any closer? That brings forward my initial point, that all should be obtained easily.

Attempting to try and sustain intangibility as an indulgence only provides short-term gratification that accumulates an exponential expense. To lean into this principle means constantly enticing a pursuit of relative tension and the relief through depravity. To maintain an obfuscated abstraction that strengthens through projection is a contradictory ideal that deviates from convenience for all that is left is conforming to instability.

That’s too much work for me, and I am already so tired. I can go as far as I can, bound by my own nature, my own will. Swimming in endeavors that please with rest stops and a scenic route, not torturous waters or rough terrain for the sake of being able to state so. Any attempt to deviate from ease confirms my suspicions than to negate them, all that forcefully continues inevitably leads to a cyclical justification that effort is equivalent to difficulty, and difficulty justifies value.

I will find what’s the heaviest to carry and pull it from under me. It’s the most convenient way to move without exhaustion, so we can reach for what’s the most enjoyable without having to stop playing.